Key result
Planned RCT compares proximal versus distal No-Touch saphenous vein harvesting for CABG leg wound complications.
Why the study?
The optimum segment of saphenous vein for the No-Touch harvesting technique is undetermined, with concerns that proximal segments may carry higher leg wound complications than distal segments.
Does harvesting proximal versus distal segments of saphenous veins by the No-Touch technique affect major leg wound complications in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery?
RCT (n=100)
Participant and outcome assessor blinded
Within-subject randomized
No
Does harvesting proximal versus distal segments of saphenous veins by the No-Touch technique affect major leg wound complications in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery?
This protocol describes the first randomized within-subject trial to evaluate whether proximal versus distal saphenous vein harvesting using the No-Touch technique impacts leg wound complications in CABG surgery.
Background : The No-Touch saphenous vein harvesting technique has been proved to reduce vein graft occlusion after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. However, the optimum segment of the saphenous vein for this technique is still undetermined. Previous studies implicated lower occlusion of proximal segments of saphenous veins compared to distal segments, but with concern of higher leg wound complications. No randomized trials have been carried out accordingly. This pilot study is a single-center randomized within-subject-controlled tria l, comparing the leg wound complications of proximal segments of saphenous veins harvested by No-Touch versus distal segments. Methods : The study is planning intending to enroll 100 coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients from our institution, with each patient requiring two vein grafts with or without cardiopulmonary bypass. Both proximal and distal segments of saphenous veins will be harvested by No-Touch technique from ipsilateral legs. The proximal vein segments will be randomized to the left or right coronary territory for bypassing. The primary endpoint is major leg wound complications at 6 days postoperatively. Secondary endpoints include major leg wound complications during 3-month follow-up and graft vessel occlusion at 3 months and 1 year. Clinical events include major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events and recurrence of angina Discussion : This is the first study assessing the safety and effectiveness between different segments of No-Touch saphenous veins for coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and will help to establish preliminary evidence for decision making of precise vein graft conduit choice. Trial registration : ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04284956
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tian et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Surgery (n=100). Proximal segment of saphenous vein harvested by No-Touch technique vs. Distal segment of saphenous vein harvested by No-Touch technique was evaluated on Major leg wound complication at 6 days postoperatively. A planned randomized within-subject controlled trial will compare major leg wound complications between proximal and distal segments of saphenous veins harvested by the No-Touch technique in CABG surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: