Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract A good deal of work has been done over the years in an attempt to use statistical or probabilistic techniques as a basis for automatic indexing and content analysis. ( 1–10 ) Unfortunately, many of these methods are lacking in effectiveness, and the more refined procedures are computationally unattractive. A new technique, known as discrimination value analysis, ranks the text words in accordance with how well they are able to discriminate the documents of a collection from each other; that is, the value of a term depends on how much the average separation between individual documents changes when the given term is assigned for content identification. The best words are those which achieve the greatest separation. The discrimination value analysis is computationally simple, and it assigns a specific role in content analysis to single words, juxtaposed words and phrases, and word groups or thesaurus categories. Experimental results are given showing the effectiveness of the technique.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Gerard Salton
United States Geological Survey
Chul‐Su Yang
Ansan University
C. Yu
Macau University of Science and Technology
Journal of the American Society for Information Science
Cornell University
University of Alberta
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Salton et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0da8c988250cfcc2a50eba — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630260106
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: