This paper examines the constituency-oriented behavior of House incumbents using both public-record and interview data from the late 1970s and early 1980s. It evaluates three broad theoretical perspectives: the rational, which sees constituency attentiveness as the result of electoral threat; the institutional, which holds that the House itself is a powerful molder of behavior; and the sociological, which sees behavior of incumbents as a function of social forces outside the institution. Modes of analysis include: (1) a panel of members, (2) a panel of districts in which the entry of new incumbents can be used to detect cohort effects, and (3) a cross-section to estimate the effects of exogenous variables which do not vary across the span of our panel. All three theoretical perspectives receive considerable support.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McAdams et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: