The present study aimed to test the effects of different dietary inclusion levels of fishmeal (F) and blends of poultry processed protein meals (P), i.e. poultry by-product meal, hydrolysed feather meal, dry-blood meal in African catfish ( Clarias gariepinus ). Fish were fed during 84 days with four practical diets, i.e. diet HF-LP (F: 90 g kg −1 ; P: 227 g kg −1 ), diet MF-MP (F: 45 g kg −1 ; P: 280 g kg −1 ), diet HF-HP (F: 90 g kg −1 ; P: 315 g kg −1 ), and diet LF-HP (F: 10 g kg −1 ; P: 392 g kg −1 ). Fish fed diet LF-HP showed the lowest protein and lipid digestibility coefficients (82 % and 92 % vs. 84 % and 94 %, respectively; p <0.05) compared to fish fed the other diets, and the worst performance in terms of final body weight (551 g vs. 673 g), feed intake (247 g d −1 vs. 301 g d −1 ), condition factor (0.83 vs. 0.86), specific growth rate (2.69 % d −1 vs. 3.14 % d −1 ), and feed conversion ratio (1.34 vs. 1.11) ( p <0.001). Fish fed diet MF-MP reported the highest survival rate compared to other diets (96.8 % vs. 94.5 %; p <0.001). Fish fed diets with the highest inclusion rates of poultry by-product meal (140 g kg −1 or 165 g kg −1 ) and hydrolysed feather meal (125 g kg −1 or 135 g kg −1 ) were associated with the lowest fillet yield (46.2 % vs. 47.1 %) respect to fish fed the other diets ( p <0.05). In conclusion, a diet with 10 g kg −1 of fishmeal and 392 g kg −1 of a blend of poultry processed animal proteins is not suitable to sustain the performance of African catfish, whereas a diet with a minimum content of fishmeal at 45 g kg −1 and a blend of poultry processed animal proteins at about 280 g kg −1 could be technically and economically attractive for the RAS farming of this species. • Blends of poultry processed animal proteins (PAPs) were tested in commercial diets for African catfish. • High rates of poultry PAPs (392 g kg −1 ) impaired digestibility, growth, and fillet quality. • A diet with 45 g kg −1 fishmeal and 280 g kg −1 PAPs was the best as for technical and economical profitability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fanizza et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: