There is a plethora of studies on interest groups in the European Union. While these studies generated a wealth of insights, it is not actually clear what they have accomplished. This Review seeks to identify those areas of interest group studies in which our knowledge fairly consolidated and in which major research gaps or major controversies can be noted. I that these research gaps and controversies stem from both the empirical variance in the group landscape and the theoretical segmentation of EU interest group studies. These been shaped by influences from Comparative Politics, International Relations, Policy, and Democratic Theory. I suggest that future research should engage to a greater in cross-cutting theoretical debates in order to overcome the pronounced demarcation research areas and in more rigorous theory testing than has sometimes been the case. The starts by discussing the problem of conceptualizing interest groups before moving on the fissured theoretical landscape. Thereafter, major research themes are discussed. First, review the relation between EU institutions and interest groups. Here, I look both into governance and Europeanization studies that focus on the vertical interaction and analyses that stress the horizontal segmentation of the EU system in different institutions sectors. Second, I analyze core themes of EU and comparative interest group studies, the issue of collective action, the access of interest groups to policy-makers and their on EU policymaking.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rainer Eising (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: