Key result
CMR-derived aortic flow hemodynamics predict high-risk exercise capacity with an AUC of ~0.77.
Why the study?
Increased blood flow eccentricity in the aorta is linked to aortic pathology, but its association with exercise capacity had not been investigated.
Does aortic flow eccentricity correlate with aging and exercise capacity in healthy subjects?
Cohort (n=169)
Does aortic flow eccentricity correlate with aging and exercise capacity in healthy subjects?
Aortic flow hemodynamics derived from CMR change with aging and can predict exercise capacity in healthy subjects.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Aortic flow metrics on CMR associate with age and exercise capacity; hypothesis-generating, requiring prospective validation before clinical use.
Aims Increased blood flow eccentricity in the aorta has been associated with aortic (AO) pathology, however, its association with exercise capacity has not been investigated. This study aimed to assess the relationships between flow eccentricity parameters derived from 2-dimensional (2D) phase-contrast (PC) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging and aging and cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) in a cohort of healthy subjects. Methods and Results One hundred and sixty-nine healthy subjects (age 44 ± 13 years, M/F: 96/73) free of cardiovascular disease were recruited in a prospective study (NCT03217240) and underwent CMR, including 2D PC at an orthogonal plane just above the sinotubular junction, and CPET (cycle ergometer) within one week. The following AO flow parameters were derived: AO forward and backward flow indexed to body surface area (FFi, BFi), average flow displacement during systole (FDsavg), late systole (FDlsavg), diastole (FDdavg), systolic retrograde flow (SRF), systolic flow reversal ratio (sFRR), and pulse wave velocity (PWV). Exercise capacity was assessed by peak oxygen uptake (PVO2) from CPET. The mean values of FDsavg, FDlsavg, FDdavg, SRF, sFRR, and PWV were 17 ± 6%, 19 ± 8%, 29 ± 7%, 4.4 ± 4.2 mL, 5.9 ± 5.1%, and 4.3 ± 1.6 m/s, respectively. They all increased with age (r = 0.623, 0.628, 0.353, 0.590, 0.649, 0.598, all P < 0.0001), and decreased with PVO2 (r = −0.302, −0.270, −0.253, −0.149, −0.219, −0.161, all P < 0.05). A stepwise multivariable linear regression analysis using left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), FFi, and FDsavg showed an area under the curve of 0.769 in differentiating healthy subjects with high-risk exercise capacity (PVO2 ≤ 14 mL/kg/min). Conclusion AO flow haemodynamics change with aging and predict exercise capacity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Healthy subjects (n=169). Aortic flow eccentricity parameters derived from CMR was evaluated on Differentiating healthy subjects with high-risk exercise capacity (PVO2 ≤ 14 mL/kg/min) (AUC 0.769). Aortic flow hemodynamics derived from CMR, including systolic flow displacement, increased with age (P<0.0001) and predicted high-risk exercise capacity with an AUC of 0.769.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: