PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 14, 2018Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis47 citationsOpen Access

Best of the Best: A Comparison of Factor Models

SAShamim AhmedZBZiwen BuDTDaniel Tsvetanov

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

We compare major factor models and find that the Stambaugh and Yuan (2016) 4-factor model is the overall winner in the time-series domain. The Hou, Xue, and Zhang (2015) q -factor model takes second place and the Fama and French (2015) 5-factor model and the Barillas and Shanken (2018) 6-factor model jointly take third place. The pairwise cross-sectional R 2 and the multiple model comparison tests show that the Hou et al. (2015) q -factor model, the Fama and French (2015) 5-factor and 4-factor models, and the Barillas and Shanken (2018) 6-factor model take equal first place in the horse race.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ahmed et al. (2018) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0dbe2436162e2f4b09b43fhttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0022109018000947
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper