With female employment patterns and their ever-diverging degrees in Korea and Japan, this paper identifies which factors influence womens labor supply around childbirth in each country, and draws cross-country analysis. It also aims to understand the different social context of each labor market, general attitudes towards female employment and work-life balance in two countries. With KLIPS and JPSC – the nationally representative panel data in each country –, we find that both Korean and Japanese women with more human capital and better employment status are likely to retain regular jobs. Japanese womens employment, whether regular or non-regular, is positively affected by ones cohort (the cohort effect), while negative by her spouses income level. On the contrary, the results of Korean women demonstrate no signs of such similarity as in Japan. Consequently, it indicates that womens human capitals and job opportunities function as key mechanism determining their employment status in both countries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nishimura et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: