Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Recently, communication scholars have published research using a type of significance testing that might be called a “one-tailed F-test.” The use of such tests lead authors to report as statistically significant F-values that would not be considered as statistically significant according to the critical values presented in standard F-tables. This paper documents the recent use of one-tailed F-tests in communication journals, and examines the arguments both for and against the use of one-tailed Fs. The use of these tests is examined within the broader unresolved controversy surrounding the use of one-tailed tests in general. Based on the relative merits of various views, suggestions are made for future practices. It is recommended that future researchers should most often avoid one-tailed Fs, and generally exercise greater caution with one-tailed tests in general. Annual meeting of the International Communication Association San Francisco, CA
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Levine et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: