Key result
SPPH-AMI model achieves 0.76 AUC for early AMI diagnosis in CKD patients.
Why the study?
The incidence of acute myocardial infarction is increased in patients with chronic kidney disease, but early diagnosis in this population remains poor.
Does the SPPH-AMI-model accurately diagnose acute myocardial infarction in patients with chronic kidney disease?
Observational (n=829)
No
Does the SPPH-AMI-model accurately diagnose acute myocardial infarction in patients with chronic kidney disease?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.76 (95% CI 0.73-0.80)
A novel multivariable risk model incorporating clinical and laboratory factors demonstrated moderate diagnostic accuracy for the early detection of acute myocardial infarction in patients with chronic kidney disease.
Should not yet change practice for AMI diagnosis in CKD; hypothesis-generating and warrants prospective validation.
Introduction: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains a critical disease, characterized by a high fatality rate in several countries. In clinical practice, the incidence of AMI is increased in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, the early diagnosis of AMI in the above group of patients is still poor. Methods: for patients with mildly reduced kidney function, who attended the Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital (SPPH) between January 2018 and November 2022 were enrolled. All patients underwent coronary angiography due to the presence of typical or atypical symptoms of AMI. Patients were divided into the following two groups: The training cohort, including 255 participants with AMI and 242 without AMI; and the testing cohort, including 165 and 167 subjects with and without AMI, respectively. Furthermore, a forward stepwise regression model and a multivariable logistic regression model, named SPPH-AMI-model, were constructed to select significant predictors and assist the diagnosis of AMI in patients with CKD, respectively. Results: The following factors were evaluated in the model: Smoking status, high sensitivity cardiac troponin I, serum creatinine and uric acid levels, history of percutaneous coronary intervention and electrocardiogram. Additionally, the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve were determined in the risk model in the training set [AUC, 0.78; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.74-0.82] vs. the testing set (AUC, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.69-0.79) vs. the combined set (AUC, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.73-0.80). Finally, the sensitivity and specificity rates were 71.12 and 71.21%, respectively, the percentage of cases correctly classified was 71.14%, while positive and negative predictive values of 71.63 and 70.70%, respectively, were also recorded. Discussion: The results of the current study suggested that the SPPH-AMI-model could be currently considered as the only risk scoring system for the early diagnosis of AMI in patients with CKD. This method could help clinicians and emergency physicians to quickly and accurately diagnose AMI in patients with CKD to promote the immediate and effective treatment of these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Su et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Acute myocardial infarction in patients with chronic kidney disease (n=829). SPPH-AMI-model was evaluated on Area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve in the combined set (AUC 0.76, 95% CI 0.73-0.80). The SPPH-AMI-model for early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with chronic kidney disease achieved an AUC of 0.76 (95% CI 0.73-0.80) in the combined set.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: