Liouville’s best-known theorem, ḟ({q,p},t)=0, describes the incompressible flow of phase-space probability density, f({q,p},t). This incompressible-flow theorem follows directly from Hamilton’s equations of motion. It applies to simulations of isolated systems composed of interacting particles, whether or not the particles are confined by a box potential. Provided that the particle–particle and particle–box collisions are sufficiently mixing, the long-time-averaged value 〈f〉 approaches, in a “coarse-grained” sense, Gibbs’ equilibrium microcanonical probability density, feq, from which all equilibrium properties follow, according to Gibbs’ statistical mechanics. All these ideas can be extended to many-body simulations of deterministic open systems with nonequilibrium boundary conditions incorporating heat transfer. Then Liouville’s compressible phase-space-flow theorem—in the original ḟ≠0 form—applies. I illustrate and contrast Liouville’s two theorems for two simple nonequilibrium systems, in each case considering both stationary and time-dependent cases. Gibbs’ distributions for incompressible (equilibrium) flows are typically smooth. Surprisingly, the long-time-averaged phase-space distributions of nonequilibrium compressible-flow systems are instead singular and “multifractal.” The nonequilibrium analog of Gibbs’ entropy, S≡−k〈lnf〉, diverges, to −∞, in such a case. Gibbs’ classic remedy for such entropy errors was to “coarse-grain” the probability density—by averaging over finite cells of dimensions ∏Δq Δp. Such a coarse graining is effective for isolated systems approaching equilibrium, and leads to a unique entropy. Coarse graining is not as useful for deterministic open systems, constrained so as to describe stationary nonequilibrium states. Such systems have a Gibbs’ entropy which depends, logarithmically, upon the grain size. The two Liouville’s theorems, their applications to Gibbs’ entropy, and to the grain-size dependence of that entropy, are clearly illustrated here with simple example problems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wm. G. Hoover (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: