Key result
Self-management support interventions show limited effectiveness in chronically ill patients with low SES.
Why the study?
Do self-management support interventions improve patient-related and economic outcomes in chronically ill patients with low socio-economic status?
Systematic Review (n=27)
Do self-management support interventions improve patient-related and economic outcomes in chronically ill patients with low socio-economic status?
There is currently limited evidence to support the effectiveness of specific self-management support interventions for chronically ill patients with low socio-economic status.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Self-management support lacks proven effectiveness in low-SES chronically ill patients; challenges broad implementation and leaves open need for tailored trials.
AIM: To assess the quality of evidence and determine the effect of patient-related and economic outcomes of self-management support interventions in chronically ill patients with a low socio-economic status. BACKGROUND: Integrated evidence on self-management support interventions in chronically ill people with low socio-economic status is lacking. DESIGN: Systematic literature review. DATA SOURCES: Cochrane database of trials, PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycINFO and Joanna Briggs Institute Library were searched (2000-2013). Randomized controlled trials addressing self-management support interventions for patients with cardiovascular disease, stroke, cancer, diabetes and/or chronic respiratory disease were included. REVIEW METHODS: Data extraction and quality assessment were performed by independent researchers using a data extraction form. RESULTS: Studies (n = 27) focused mainly on diabetes. Fourteen studies cited an underlying theoretical basis. Most frequently used self-management support components were lifestyle advice, information provision and symptom management. Problem-solving and goal-setting strategies were frequently integrated. Eleven studies adapted interventions to the needs of patients with a low socio-economic status. No differences were found for interventions developed based on health behaviour theoretical models. CONCLUSION: Limited evidence was found for self-management support interventions in chronically ill patients with low socio-economic status. Essential characteristics and component(s) of effective self-management support interventions for these patients could not be detected. Rigorous reporting on development and underlying theories in the intervention is recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hecke et al. (2016) conducted a systematic review in Chronic conditions and low socio-economic status (n=27). Self-management support interventions was evaluated on Patient-related and economic outcomes. Self-management support interventions in chronically ill patients with low socio-economic status showed limited evidence of effectiveness across 27 included randomized controlled trials.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: