Key result
Greater clinical severity, impairment, and absences are linked to treatment non-response in partial hospitalization programs.
Why the study?
A meaningful portion of patients receiving psychological treatment do not respond, and identifying variables associated with non-response may allow clinicians to better predict non-responders and alter treatment procedures.
What baseline variables predict non-response to partial hospitalization program treatment in patients with anxiety or depression?
Observational
What baseline variables predict non-response to partial hospitalization program treatment in patients with anxiety or depression?
Greater clinical severity, functional impairment, and absences predict non-response to partial hospitalization programs for anxiety and depression.
Severity, impairment, and absences were associated with non-response; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before guiding partial hospitalization care.
OBJECTIVE: A meaningful portion of patients receiving psychological treatment do not respond to treatment. Identifying variables associated with non-response may allow clinicians to better predict who is less likely to respond, and alter treatment procedures accordingly. Therefore, this study aimed to characterize patients who did not respond to treatment in a partial hospitalization program and identify baseline variables that are most predictive of non-response. METHODS: Variables were compared between responders and non-responders using chi-square tests of independence and independent samples t-tests. Two logistic LASSO regression models were conducted to separately identify variables associated with treatment non-response in a sample of patients with elevated anxiety or depression, respectively. RESULTS: 24.8% of patients with elevated anxiety symptoms were classified as anxiety non-responders (n = 315), while 36.3% of patients with elevated depression symptoms were classified as depression non-responders (n = 445). Non-responders in both groups were characterized by greater clinical severity at baseline and discharge. Non-response in both groups was predicted by more comorbid diagnoses, greater functional impairment at baseline at discharge, and a greater number of treatment days attended and missed. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that patients with greater levels of clinical severity, more functional impairment, and a greater number of absences were less likely to respond to PHP treatment. It is important to replicate these findings in independent samples to further examine what variables may be associated with non-response in this treatment setting, and therefore identify clinical strategies to reduce this phenomenon.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Terrill et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Anxiety and depression. Partial hospitalization program was evaluated on Treatment non-response. Treatment non-response in a partial hospitalization program occurred in 24.8% of anxiety and 36.3% of depression patients, and was predicted by greater clinical severity, impairment, and absences.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: