Key result
Choice of HRV representation does not impact RSA estimates in healthy populations.
Why the study?
It was unclear whether the selection of different mathematical HRV representations affects the quantification of cardiorespiratory interactions, specifically respiratory sinus arrhythmia.
Observational (n=13)
No
Different mathematical representations of HRV do not significantly alter the estimation of Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia in healthy individuals.
RSA estimates remain robust across HRV representations in health; leaves open generalizability to clinical populations.
The Heart Rate Variability (HRV) is a noninvasive tool to evaluate the activity of the autonomic nervous system. To study the HRV, different mathematical representations can be used. The selection of a representation might have an effect on the evaluation of the mechanisms that modulate the Heart Rate (HR). One of these mechanisms is the Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia (RSA), i.e. an increased HR during inhalation and a decreased HR during exhalation. Different methods exist to quantify the RSA. A common approach is to calculate the power in the High Frequency (HF, 0.15 -0.4 Hz) band of the spectrum of the HRV representation. More recently proposed methods use the respiratory signals to estimate the strength of the RSA. This paper studies the effect of the HRV representations on the quantification of the RSA. To this end, an experiment is used in which the sympathetic and parasympathetic branches of the autonomic nervous system are selectively blocked. Three different HRV representations are considered. Afterwards, the strength of the RSA is estimated using three approaches, namely the spectral content in the HF band of the HRV representations, orthogonal subspace projections and a time-frequency representation. The results suggest that the selection of an HRV representation does not have a significant impact on the RSA estimates in a healthy population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morales et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Healthy (n=13). Atropine or propranolol vs. Control (no drug) was evaluated on Respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) quantification. The selection of a heart rate variability representation does not have a significant impact on respiratory sinus arrhythmia estimates in a healthy population.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: