Key result
AVEIR VR leadless pacemakers provide a safe and effective alternative to traditional transvenous pacing.
Why the study?
With the FDA approval of the AVEIR VR helix-based active fixation leadless pacemaker system, a step-by-step implantation guide covering procedural planning, technique, and complications was needed.
This review provides a comprehensive step-by-step guide for the implantation of the newly FDA-approved AVEIR VR helix-based active fixation leadless pacemaker system.
Offers implantation guidance for newly approved AVEIR VR; leaves open need for randomized comparisons to transvenous systems.
INTRODUCTION: Leadless cardiac pacemakers are an alternative modality to traditional transvenous pacemaker systems. Recently receiving Food and Drug Administration approval, the AVEIR VR leadless pacemaker system provides a helix based active fixation leadless pacemaker system. This step-by-step review will cover patient selection, preprocedural planning, device implantation technique, implant site evaluation, troubleshooting, short- and long-term complications as well as future directions for leadless pacing. METHODS: We collected and reviewed cases from primary operators to provide a step-by-step review for implanters. RESULTS: Our paper provides a guide to patient selection, pre-procedural planning, device im plantation technique, implant site evaluation, troubleshooting, short- and long-term complications as well as future directions for leadless pacing. CONCLUSION: The helix based active fixation leadless pacemaker system is a safe and efficacious way to provide pacing support to patients and provides an alternative to transvenous pacing systems. Our review provides a step-by-step guide to implantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Laczay et al. (2022) conducted a review in Patients requiring pacing support. AVEIR VR leadless pacemaker system vs. Traditional transvenous pacemaker systems was evaluated. The AVEIR VR helix-based active fixation leadless pacemaker system provides a safe and efficacious alternative to traditional transvenous pacing systems.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: