Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We have produced and characterized a new CD40 monoclonal antibody, mAb 89, which in the presence of anti-IgM antibodies co-stimulates to induce B cell proliferation. mAb 89 activates resting B cells as shown by an increase in cell volume and an enhanced subsequent proliferation of B cells in response to anti-IgM antibody. However, mAb 89 does not prepare B cells to respond to the growth-promoting activity of interleukin (IL) 2 or IL 4. Unlike IL 2 and IL 4, mAb 89 only weakly stimulates the proliferation of anti-IgM pre-activated B cells. Thus, the activating properties of anti-CD40 are likely to explain its co-stimulatory effect on B cells. Interestingly, the anti-CD40 mAb 89 was found to act in synergy with IL 4, but not with IL 2, in co-stimulation and restimulation assays. In this respect, anti-CD40 does not induce a significant increase of B cell surface IL 4 receptors while IL 4, but not IL 2, induces a twofold increase of the CD40 antigen expression. Thus the synergistic interaction between IL 4 and anti-CD40 may be related to the IL 4-dependent increase of CD40 antigen expression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vallé et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: