Why the study?
Does pharmacological stress testing of the His-Purkinje system predict impending high grade AV block in patients with bifascicular block and syncope?
Does pharmacological stress testing of the His-Purkinje system predict impending high grade AV block in patients with bifascicular block and syncope?
Pharmacological stress testing with Class I antiarrhythmic agents during electrophysiological study may be of diagnostic value for predicting high grade AV block in patients with bifascicular block and syncope.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid EP risk stratification in bifascicular block with syncope; leaves open prospective validation before routine pacing decisions.
This literature review, based mainly on the English-language literature, focuses on pharmacological stress testing of the His-Purkinje system as part of an invasive electrophysiological study. The main target group for this investigation is patients with bifascicular block and syncope in which intermittent high grade AV block is suspected. Several drugs have been used for this purpose, mainly Class I antiarrhythmic agents such as ajmaline, procainamide, disopyramide, and flecainide. Most studies, unfortunately, suffer from limited patient numbers, lack of adequate control groups, and/or adequate follow-up. The sensitivity of the disopyramide stress test has been shown to be 75%-100% for prediction of impending high grade AV block. The specificity was > 90%. Studies on procainamide have shown a sensitivity of 60% but the specificity has not been assessed. There are no studies allowing a strict comparison of the diagnostic value of pharmacological provocation with different drugs. Based on the similarities of the electrophysiological effects on the His-Purkinje system of the above Class I agents, it is reasonable to assume that all of them might be of diagnostic value in the present clinical context, provided atrial and ventricular stimulation after drug is included in the protocol.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
ENCLUND et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: