Purpose and aim of the study: to perform an analysis of the management functions of hunting societies, identify internal and external factors that influence their performance, and propose ways for improvement. Design/methodology/Approach: During the study, the activities of the hunting society have been described, the boards of directors of hunting societies have been interviewed, the strengths and weaknesses of the hunting society have been analysed, proposals have been developed for improvement of the activities of the hunting society.Main Findings: The study examines how the society's leadership can contribute to sustainable resource use and protection. The hunting society must be effective and well-organised to perform its functions successfully.Originality: The paper analyses the management functions of the hunting society as well as the possibilities to improve its management processes. The work of the hunting society and its management are also capable of influencing public attitudes towards hunting, as well as the use of natural resources.Implications: The study development process analyses how to build successful collaboration with the rest of society, and how to successfully overcome the challenges facing hunting societies. For example, environmental change, lack of resources or negative public attitudes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Korklis et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: