BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Biochemical recurrence (BCR) risk stratification guides treatment decisions after primary prostate cancer (PCa) treatment. We evaluated high-risk BCR (HR-BCR) definitions after radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiotherapy (RT) and their association with PCa-specific mortality (PCSM). METHODS: A population-based cohort study including 17 753 men treated with RP (n = 12 010) or RT (n = 5743) for localized PCa in Stockholm County between 2003 and 2021 was conducted. We assessed the cumulative incidence of any BCR (RP: prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≥0.2; RT: PSA ≥nadir + 2), European Association of Urology (EAU) HR-BCR (PSA doubling time ≤1 yr or pathological International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group 4-5 after RP; time to BCR ≤18 mo or biopsy ISUP grade group 4-5 after RT), and EMBARK HR-BCR (PSA doubling time ≤9 mo and PSA >1 ng/ml after RP or PSA ≥nadir + 2 ng/ml after RT). PCSM after HR-BCR was estimated using the competing risk method. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: The 10-yr incidence of HR-BCR was 10% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9-11) for EAU HR-BCR and 4% (95% CI: 3-4) for EMBARK HR-BCR after RP, and 10% (95% CI: 9-11) for both definitions after RT. Patients meeting the EMBARK criteria had the highest PCSM (RP: 30%, 95% CI: 24-37; RT: 50%, 95% CI: 45-56). Up to 50% of RP and 31% of RT patients with BCR did not progress to HR-BCR and had lower PCSM. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: HR-BCR incidence varies by definition and treatment. The EMBARK criteria identify a smaller subset with the highest PCSM risk. Many patients with BCR never develop HR-BCR. Refining BCR definitions with PSA kinetics and imaging may optimize risk stratification, balancing therapeutic efficacy and overtreatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Falagario et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: