PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 23, 2018PLoS ONE25 citationsOpen Access

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus warfarin for the prevention of spontaneous echo-contrast and thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter undergoing cardioversion: A trans-esophageal echocardiography study

View Full Paper
YKYun Gi KimJCJong‐Il ChoiMKMi‐Na Kim

Key Result

NOACs were comparable to warfarin in preventing spontaneous echo-contrast (43.9% vs 44.4%; p=0.919) and thrombus (4.3% vs 2.2%; p=0.281) in patients undergoing cardioversion.

Structured PICO

Does NOAC compared to warfarin reduce the prevalence of spontaneous echo-contrast and thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter undergoing cardioversion?

P
Population
344 patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter who underwent direct current cardioversion and pre-DCCV trans-esophageal echocardiography evaluation, anticoagulated for at least 21 days.
I
Intervention
Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) including direct thrombin inhibitor and factor Xa inhibitors
C
Comparator
Warfarin
O
Outcome
Prevalence of spontaneous echo-contrast (SEC) and thrombus on trans-esophageal echocardiographysurrogate

NOACs are comparable to warfarin in preventing spontaneous echo-contrast and thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter undergoing cardioversion, though a numerical increase in thrombus with NOACs requires further study.

Abstract

Spontaneous echo-contrast (SEC) and thrombus observed in trans-esophageal echocardiography (TEE) is known as a strong surrogate marker for future risk of ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter (AFL). The efficacy of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) compared to warfarin to prevent SEC or thrombus in patients with AF or AFL is currently unknown. AF or AFL patients who underwent direct current cardioversion (DCCV) and pre-DCCV TEE evaluation from January 2014 to October 2016 in a single center were analyzed. The prevalence of SEC and thrombus were compared between patients who received NOAC and those who took warfarin. NOAC included direct thrombin inhibitor and factor Xa inhibitors. Among 1,050 patients who were considered for DCCV, 424 patients anticoagulated with warfarin or NOAC underwent TEE prior to DCCV. Eighty patients who were anticoagulated for less than 21 days were excluded. Finally, 344 patients were included for the analysis (180 warfarin users vs. 164 NOAC users). No significant difference in the prevalence of SEC (44.4% vs. 43.9%; p = 0.919), dense SEC (13.9% vs. 15.2%; p = 0.722), or thrombus (2.2% vs. 4.3%; p = 0.281) was observed between the warfarin group and the NOAC group. In multivariate analysis, there was no association between NOAC and risk of SEC (odds ratio OR: 1.4, 95% CI: 0.796-2.297, p = 0.265) or thrombus (OR: 3.4, 95% CI: 0.726-16.039, p = 0.120). In conclusion, effectiveness of NOAC is comparable to warfarin in preventing SEC and thrombus in patients with AF or AFL undergoing DCCV. However, numerical increase in the prevalence of thrombus in NOAC group warrants further evaluation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kim et al. (2018) studied this question. NOACs were comparable to warfarin in preventing spontaneous echo-contrast (43.9% vs 44.4%; p=0.919) and thrombus (4.3% vs 2.2%; p=0.281) in patients undergoing cardioversion.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0e4dd6bc348c84f2fd999ahttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191648
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper