Key result
Colchicine fails to reduce major events vs standard care in hospitalized COVID-19 patients with cardiac injury.
Why the study?
The impact of colchicine on hospitalized patients with COVID-19-related cardiac injury was unknown.
Does colchicine reduce the composite of all-cause mortality, need for mechanical ventilation, or need for mechanical circulatory support in hospitalized adult patients with COVID-19 and cardiac injury?
RCT (n=93)
Open-label
1:1
Yes
Does colchicine reduce the composite of all-cause mortality, need for mechanical ventilation, or need for mechanical circulatory support in hospitalized adult patients with COVID-19 and cardiac injury?
Colchicine added to standard of care did not improve clinical outcomes at 90 days in hospitalized COVID-19 patients with evidence of cardiac injury.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Colchicine should not be used for this indication; confirms lack of benefit on the primary composite in this RCT.
Introduction The impact of colchicine on hospitalized patients with Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) related cardiac injury is unknown. Materials and Methods In this multicenter randomized controlled open-label clinical trial, we randomized hospitalized adult patients with documented COVID-19 and evidence of cardiac injury in a 1:1 ratio to either colchicine 0.6 mg po twice daily for 30 days plus standard of care or standard of care alone. Cardiac injury was defined as elevated cardiac biomarkers, new arrhythmia, new/worsened left ventricular dysfunction, or new pericardial effusion. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality, need for mechanical ventilation, or need for mechanical circulatory support (MCS) at 90 days. Key secondary endpoints included the individual components of the primary endpoint and change in and at least 2-grade reduction in the World Health Organization (WHO) Ordinal Scale at 30 days. The trial is registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04355143). Results We enrolled 93 patients, 48 patients in the colchicine arm and 45 in the control arm. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome between the colchicine and control arms (19 vs. 15%, p = 0.78), nor in the individual components of all-cause mortality (17 vs. 15%, p = 1.0) and need for mechanical ventilation (8 vs. 5%, p = 0.68); no patients in either group required MCS. The change in (−1.8 ± 2.4 vs. −1.2 ± 2.0, p = 0.12) and at least 2-grade reduction (75 vs. 75%, p = 1.0) in the WHO ordinal scale was also similar between groups. Conclusion Patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and evidence of cardiac injury did not benefit from colchicine therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rabbani et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in COVID-19 with cardiac injury (n=93). Colchicine vs. Standard of care was evaluated on Composite of all-cause mortality, need for mechanical ventilation, or need for mechanical circulatory support (MCS) at 90 days (p=0.78). Colchicine did not significantly reduce the composite of all-cause mortality, need for mechanical ventilation, or need for mechanical circulatory support at 90 days compared to standard of care in hospitalized COVID-19 patients with cardiac injury (19% vs 15%, p=0.78).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: