Pre-hospital rule-out of suspected NSTE-ACS using POC troponin significantly reduced 30-day healthcare costs compared to direct ED transfer (mean difference €611; 95% CI 353-869; P<0.001).
RCT (n=863)
randomized
Yes
Does a pre-hospital rule-out strategy using POC troponin measurement reduce healthcare costs in low-risk suspected NSTE-ACS patients?
A pre-hospital rule-out strategy using POC troponin in low-risk suspected NSTE-ACS patients significantly reduces healthcare costs without compromising safety.
Effect estimate: Mean difference €611 (95% CI 353-869)
Absolute Event Rate: 1349% vs 1960%
p-value: p=<0.001
AIMS: Patients with suspected non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) are routinely transferred to the emergency department (ED). A clinical risk score with point-of-care (POC) troponin measurement might enable ambulance paramedics to identify low-risk patients in whom ED evaluation is unnecessary. The aim was to assess safety and healthcare costs of a pre-hospital rule-out strategy using a POC troponin measurement in low-risk suspected NSTE-ACS patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: This investigator-initiated, randomized clinical trial was conducted in five ambulance regions in the Netherlands. Suspected NSTE-ACS patients with HEAR (History, ECG, Age, Risk factors) score ≤3 were randomized to pre-hospital rule-out with POC troponin measurement or direct transfer to the ED. The sample size calculation was based on the primary outcome of 30-day healthcare costs. Secondary outcome was safety, defined as 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE), consisting of ACS, unplanned revascularization or all-cause death. : A total of 863 participants were randomized. Healthcare costs were significantly lower in the pre-hospital strategy (€1349 ± €2051 vs. €1960 ± €1808) with a mean difference of €611 95% confidence interval (CI): 353-869; P < 0.001. In the total population, MACE were comparable between groups 3.9% (17/434) in pre-hospital strategy vs. 3.7% (16/429) in ED strategy; P = 0.89. In the ruled-out ACS population, MACE were very low 0.5% (2/419) vs. 1.0% (4/417), with a risk difference of -0.5% (95% CI -1.6%-0.7%; P = 0.41) in favour of the pre-hospital strategy. CONCLUSION: Pre-hospital rule-out of ACS with a POC troponin measurement in low-risk patients significantly reduces healthcare costs while incidence of MACE was low in both strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT05466591 and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform id NTR 7346.
Camaro et al. (Thu,) conducted a rct in Suspected non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) (n=863). Pre-hospital rule-out with point-of-care (POC) troponin measurement vs. Direct transfer to the emergency department (ED) was evaluated on 30-day healthcare costs (Mean difference €611, 95% CI 353-869, p=<0.001). Pre-hospital rule-out of suspected NSTE-ACS using POC troponin significantly reduced 30-day healthcare costs compared to direct ED transfer (mean difference €611; 95% CI 353-869; P<0.001).