Key result
Ito-mediated J waves linked to significantly larger ΔQRS than pseudo J waves.
Why the study?
On surface ECGs, it is difficult to differentiate Ito-mediated J waves seen in J wave syndromes from terminal QRS deflections that mimic J waves (pseudo J waves) in intraventricular conduction delay.
Does ∆QRS differentiate Ito-mediated J waves from pseudo J waves produced by conduction delay on surface ECG?
Observational (n=60)
Does ∆QRS differentiate Ito-mediated J waves from pseudo J waves produced by conduction delay on surface ECG?
∆QRS is a reliable ECG parameter to distinguish true Ito-mediated J waves from pseudo J waves caused by delayed intraventricular conduction.
May aid ECG differentiation of Ito-mediated J waves from conduction delay; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Background On surface electrocardiographic (ECGs), it is difficult to differentiate I to ‐mediated J waves, a repolarization phenomenon seen in J wave syndromes (JWS) from terminal QRS deflections that mimic J waves (pseudo J waves) in intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD), an abnormality in depolarization. We hypothesize that the difference between the “maximum QRS duration” inclusive of J point or terminal QRS deflections and the minimum QRS duration identified across a 12‐lead ECG is significantly larger in I to ‐mediated J waves, and can serve as a marker to make this distinction. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on adults with ECGs consisting of one of the four following manifestations: J waves associated with hypothermia and early repolarization, and pseudo J waves associated with right bundle branch block (RBBB) and non‐specific intraventricular conduction delay (NS‐IVCD). All ECGs were assessed individually and the maximum and minimum discrete QRS deflections on 12‐lead tracings, defined as “QRS max ” and QRS min , were identified. The difference between “QRS max ” and QRS min , designated as ∆QRS, was calculated and compared across the studied populations. Results A total of 60 patients consisting of 15 patients in each arm were included in the study. ΔQRS was significantly larger in the hypothermia and early repolarization groups, compared to RBBB and NS‐IVCD ( p < .0001), with the following mean ∆QRS: hypothermia 54.3 ± 13.7 ms, early repolarization pattern 47.3 ± 15.3 ms, RBBB 19.3 ± 6.5 ms, and NS‐IVCD 16.0 ± 6.6 ms. Conclusion ∆QRS may serve as a reliable ECG parameter for distinguishing I to ‐mediated J waves from pseudo J waves produced by delayed intraventricular conduction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ooi et al. (2021) conducted an observational in J waves and pseudo J waves (n=60). ΔQRS measurement vs. Pseudo J waves (RBBB, NS-IVCD) was evaluated on ΔQRS (difference between maximum and minimum QRS duration) (p=<0.0001). ΔQRS was significantly larger in Ito-mediated J waves (hypothermia 54.3 ms, early repolarization 47.3 ms) compared to pseudo J waves (RBBB 19.3 ms, NS-IVCD 16.0 ms; p<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: