Clinical impact of combined viral and bacterial infection in patients with community-acquired pneumonia

BACKGROUND: New methods for identifying respiratory pathogens have led to several reports of a high yield of mixed infections in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The clinical impact of these findings has, however, not been fully evaluated. We aimed to compare patients with a pure bacterial etiology with those with findings of both bacteria and virus regarding severity of illness and length of hospital stay. METHODS: Adults with CAP admitted to Karolinska University Hospital were studied prospectively (N = 184). Microbiological methods included cultures from blood, sputum and nasopharyngeal secretions; sputum samples analyzed with quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction for Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis; nasopharyngeal specimens analyzed with polymerase chain reaction and serology for Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydophila pneumoniae and viruses common in the respiratory tract; and urine antigen assays for detecting pneumococcal and Legionella pneumophila antigens. The pneumonia severity index (PSI) was used to assess the severity of illness. RESULTS: The likelihood of getting a score corresponding to PSI classes IV or V was higher in patients with findings of both bacteria and virus than in those with a bacterial pathogen alone (odds ratio 4.98, 95% confidence interval 2.09-11.89; p < 0.001). The median length of hospital stay was 7 days among patients with mixed infections and 4 days among those with a bacterial etiology alone (p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Patients infected with a virus and a bacterial pathogen more often develop severe CAP and have a longer hospitalization than those with a bacterial etiology alone.