Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
As multirater performance assessment becomes more common, it becomes more important to understand the unique perspectives (and unique rating variance) of different raters. In this article, an approach for investigating the causes (e.g., general impressions and interpersonal affect) of rater-specific method variance in Multitrait-Multirater (MTMR) performance appraisal matrices is described and demon- strated. The approach is a combination of confirmatory factor analysis and the use of measured method factors. Results of demonstrations with 2 previously published MTMR datasets (Holzbach, 1978; Tucker, Cline, & Schmitt, 1967) suggest that both general impressions and interpersonal affect account for significant method variance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
James M. Conway (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: