Why the study?
Annual implantation rates of cardiac implantable electronic devices are increasing, warranting a summary of the literature on the evolution and future directions of cardiac pacing.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Review
Offers historical pacing context for clinicians; leaves open need for prospective trials on conduction system and leadless strategies.
The history of cardiac pacing dates back to the 1930s with externalized pacing and has evolved to incorporate transvenous, multi-lead, or even leadless devices. Annual implantation rates of cardiac implantable electronic devices have increased since the introduction of the implantable system, likely related to expanding indications, and increasing global life expectancy and aging demographics. Here, we summarize the relevant literature on cardiac pacing to demonstrate the enormous impact it has had within the field of cardiology. Further, we look forward to the future of cardiac pacing, including conduction system pacing and leadless pacing strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ballantyne et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: