Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Recommender systems are typically evaluated on their ability to provide items that satisfy the needs and interests of the end user. However, in many real world applications, users are not the only stakeholders involved. There may be a variety of individuals or organizations that benefit in different ways from the delivery of recommendations. In this paper, we re-define the recommender system as a multistakeholder environment in which different stakeholders are served by delivering recommendations, and we suggest a utility-based approach to evaluating recommendations in such an environment that is capable of distinguishing among the distributions of utility delivered to different stakeholders.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdollahpouri et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: