Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates that rivaroxaban attenuates testicular ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats, indicating a protective mechanism driven by hypoxia-inducible factor-1 suppression.
This study investigated the protective effects of Rivaroxaban (RVX) against testicular ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury in rats with a secondary aim of studying the involvement of hypoxia-inducible factor1-alpha testicular protection against ischemic insults. Twenty-four male rats were divided into four groups: sham control, testicular IR, and two RVX treatment groups (7 and 14 mg/kg) administered for one week prior to IR. Testicular IR led to significant impairment in testicular function, evidenced by an 86.5% reduction in testosterone levels and marked oxidative stress with an 189.3% increase in malondialdehyde (MDA). IR injury also triggered substantial elevations in apoptotic markers (271% increase in Bax (Bcl2-associated X protein) and 65.9% decrease in BCL2 (B-cell lymphoma 2), and inflammatory mediators (285.7% increase in NFκB (nuclear factor-kappa B). Additionally, angiogenic markers showed dramatic increases, with VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) and HIF-1 (Hypoxia inducible factor-1) rising by 431.8% and 519%, respectively. RVX treatment demonstrated dose-dependent protective effects, with the 14 mg/kg dose showing superior outcomes compared to 7 mg/kg. The higher dose significantly improved hormonal function (486.8% increase in testosterone), reduced oxidative stress (51.8% reduction in MDA), modulated apoptotic markers (68.3% decrease in BAX, 159.1% increase in BCL2), and normalized angiogenic factors (71.8% reduction in HIF-1). In conclusion, RVX demonstrated significant therapeutic potential in protecting against testicular IR injury, with the 14 mg/kg dose showing optimal protective effects. Reduction in HIF-1α and VEGF protein expression mediated RVX's anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-apoptotic effect in rats subjected to testicular IR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baset et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: