Comparative analysis reveals procedural hurdles and digital opportunities for dispute resolution in Rwanda and South Africa, highlighting avenues to expand international legal cooperation.
Digitalization has become a defining factor in the development of economies and societies in the 21st century, and African counties are no exception. Despite significant challenges - including widespread poverty, limited electricity and internet access, and low incomes - many nations have managed to enhance their investment attractiveness while safeguarding the rights and interests of citizens and businesses. This article examines the regulatory frameworks of the Kigali International Arbitration Center and the Arbitration Foundation of South Africa, focusing on procedural aspects of virtual arbitration and mediation. Particular attention is given to the challenges and opportunities for strengthening international cooperation in alternative dispute resolution in Rwanda and the Republic of South Africa. The study employs comparative analysis to assess the development of virtual arbitration and mediation, as well as causal and systemic analysis to identify the main advantages and disadvantages of integrating innovative technologies into alternative dispute resolution mechanisms. Based on dialectical methods, the article proposes directions for further improving digitalization in African countries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rusakova et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: