This article compares several promising data-driven methods for selecting the bandwidth of a kernel density estimator. The methods compared are least squares cross-validation, biased cross-validation, and a plug-in rule. The comparison is done by asymptotic rate of convergence to the optimum and a simulation study. It is seen that the plug-in bandwidth is usually most efficient when the underlying density is sufficiently smooth, but is less robust when there is not enough smoothness present. We believe the plug-in rule is the best of those currently available, but there is still room for improvement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: