PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 1976IEEE Transactions on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing158 citations

Speech recognition experiments with linear predication, bandpass filtering, and dynamic programming

View Full Paper
GWGreg WhiteRNRichard Neely

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare different preprocessing and classification methods for automatic speech recognition.
  • Preprocessing strategies include linear predictive analysis and bandpass filtering.
  • Classification is performed using either linear time stretching or dynamic programming.
  • Speech is processed as either compressed into quasi-phoneme strings or kept uncompressed.
  • Both preprocessing methods yield similar recognition scores.
  • Dynamic programming is crucial for recognizing polysyllabic words.
  • Best performance occurs with uncompressed data using nonlinear time registration for multisyllabic words.

Abstract

Automatic speech recognition experiments are described in which several popular preprocessing and classification strategies are compared. Preprocessing is done either by linear predictive analysis or by bandpass filtering. The two approaches are shown to produce similar recognition scores. The classifier uses either linear time stretching or dynamic programming to achieve time alignment. It is shown that dynamic programming is of major importance for recognition of polysyllabic words. The speech is compressed into a quasi-phoneme character string or preserved uncompressed. Best results are obtained with uncompressed data, using nonlinear time registration for multisyllabic words.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

White et al. (1976) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0e9bb327a8fd07fe04442ahttps://doi.org/10.1109/tassp.1976.1162779
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper