Why the study?
The mechanism of early right ventricular activation via anodal capture during left bundle branch pacing and whether it yields hemodynamic benefit were unknown.
Does left bundle branch pacing with anodal capture improve acute hemodynamics and ventricular activation timing compared to pacing without anodal capture in patients with LBBP leads?
Does left bundle branch pacing with anodal capture improve acute hemodynamics and ventricular activation timing compared to pacing without anodal capture in patients with LBBP leads?
While anodal capture during left bundle branch pacing improves ventricular activation timing, it requires higher pacing outputs and does not provide acute hemodynamic benefits, suggesting it may not be clinically necessary.
Suggests routine programming for anodal capture in left bundle branch pacing is clinically unnecessary; leaves.
Introduction Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) can deliver physiological left ventricular activation, but typically at the cost of delayed right ventricular (RV) activation. A proposed solution is to advance RV activation through anodal capture, but there is uncertainty regarding the mechanism by which early RV activation is achieved (capture of right bundle or RV myocardial capture) and it is not known whether this produces hemodynamic benefit. Methods We recruited patients with LBBP leads in whom anodal capture eliminated the terminal R wave in lead V1. Ventricular activation pattern, timing and high precision acute hemodynamic response were studied during LBBP with and without anodal capture. Results We recruited 21 patients, mean age 67 years, 14 were males. We measured ECG timings and hemodynamics in all patients and in 15 we also performed non-invasive mapping. Ventricular epicardial propagation maps demonstrated that right ventricular septal myocardial capture, rather than right bundle capture, was the mechanism for earlier RV activation. With anodal capture, QRS duration was shorter (116 ± 12ms versus 129 ± 14ms, p < 0.01), and total ventricular activation time was shorter (83 ± 18ms versus 90 ± 15ms, p = 0.01). This required higher outputs (3.6 ± 1.9V versus 0.6 ± 0.2V, p <0.01) but did not provide additional hemodynamic benefit (mean difference −0.2 ± 3.8 mmHg compared to pacing without anodal capture, p = 0.2). Conclusion Left bundle pacing with anodal capture advances right ventricular activation as a result of stimulation of the RV septal myocardium. However, this requires higher outputs and did not improve acute hemodynamics. Aiming for anodal capture may therefore not be necessary.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ali et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: