South Korea has long been regarded as a middle power nation. Accession to Group of Twenty (G 20) status and membership of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development-Development Assistance Committee (OECD-DAC) were heralded as confirmation of South Korea’s status as ‘global Korea’ and a middle power and seemed to also confirm the rise of second-generation middle power activism, convenor-ship and leadership. The article explores how conventional IR realism and liberalism have yet to fully explain the emergence and role of network-based middle power leaders. The article assesses current strategic issues for South Korea in the context of North Korea’s nuclear program and responses to it. From this, what emerges, are a number of strategic concerns and opportunities given the current power dynamic in the region that are currently identified as to enabling South Korea as a transforming middle power to confront what has recently been termed the new phenomenon of ‘Korea passed.’
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iain Watson (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: