Key result
CARILLON system reduces mitral regurgitant volume by ~9 mL vs control in HF with FMR.
Why the study?
Functional mitral regurgitation is common in HFrEF and worsens morbidity and mortality, prompting an individual patient data meta-analysis to evaluate the CARILLON mitral contour system versus control.
Does the CARILLON mitral contour system improve MR severity, LV remodelling, and heart failure outcomes in patients with HFrEF and functional mitral regurgitation?
Meta-Analysis (n=209)
Yes
Does the CARILLON mitral contour system improve MR severity, LV remodelling, and heart failure outcomes in patients with HFrEF and functional mitral regurgitation?
The CARILLON mitral contour system provides significant improvements in mitral regurgitation severity, left ventricular remodeling, and heart failure hospitalization rates in patients with HFrEF and functional mitral regurgitation.
Supports CARILLON to reduce MR volume in HFrEF with functional MR; confirms efficacy in Level 1 meta-analysis.
AIMS: Functional mitral regurgitation (MR) (FMR) is common in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and worsens morbidity and mortality, even when mild. The CARILLON® mitral contour system (Cardiac Dimensions, Kirkland, WA, USA), a mitral annuloplasty device delivered percutaneously to the coronary sinus, is designed to reduce the mitral annular dimension by virtue of the close anatomic relationship between the coronary sinus and the posterior mitral annulus. We performed a comprehensive individual patient data meta-analysis of all studies that used CARILLON® device vs. control that have measured mitral regurgitation severity, left ventricular (LV) remodelling, functional status, and heart failure-related outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and EMBASE were searched in July 2020. Primary outcomes of interest were measures of MR severity, LV remodelling, New York Heart Association functional class and heart failure-related outcomes [mortality and heart failure hospitalization (HFH) during follow up]. All data were received as individual patient and individual time point data-points. Mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for continuous data using a fixed-effects model. Three studies (REDUCE FMR, TITAN and TITAN II) enrolling 209 participants were identified and included. Pooled analysis showed that, compared with control, CARILLON® device significantly improved both MR volume (mean difference MD -9.20, 95% C.I. -16.11 to -2.29 mL, P = 0.009) and MR grade (MD -1.12, 95% CI -1.36 to -0.88, P < 0.00001) and this was associated with a significant reduction in LA volume, MD -7.54 mL, 95% CI -14.90 to - 0.18, P = 0.04. Significant LV reverse remodelling was also seen in terms of EDV (MD -16.53, 95% CI -28.61 to -44.4 mL, P = 0.007), and a trend in ESV (MD -8.68, 95% CI -18.69 to -1.34 mL, P = 0.09) but no significant effect on LVEF (MD 0.88, 95% CI -1.52% to 2.38%, P = 0.47), due presumably to the greater residual MR in the control patients falsely elevating the LVEF. In addition, the CARILLON® device significantly improved New York Heart Association functional Class (MD -0.22, 95% CI -0.24 to -0.16, P < 0.00001), associated with a lower rate of HFH compared with controls (45.3% vs. 64%, respectively, P = 0.04). As a sensitivity analysis we also restricted the analyses to those patients with Class 3+/4+ MR at baseline. In this cohort, the echocardiographic results were similar, and the reduction in HFH rates was even more marked (43.9% vs. 82.9%, respectively, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: This comprehensive meta-analysis of individual patient data has shown that CARILLON® device provides statistically significant and clinically meaningful benefits on MR severity, LA and LV volumes, and remodelling and rates of subsequent heart failure hospitalization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giallauria et al. (2020) conducted a meta-analysis in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and functional mitral regurgitation (n=209). CARILLON mitral contour system vs. Control (sham or recaptured device) was evaluated on Mitral regurgitant volume (MD -9.20 mL, 95% CI -16.11 to -2.29, p=0.009). The CARILLON mitral contour system significantly reduced mitral regurgitant volume by a mean difference of 9.20 mL compared to control in patients with heart failure and functional mitral regurgitation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: