Key result
A prognostic index using four simple clinical variables successfully stratified 1-year post-AMI mortality risk into high (30%), intermediate (9%), and low (3%) risk groups.
Why the study?
Can simple clinical variables predict 1-year mortality in patients discharged after acute myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=769)
Can simple clinical variables predict 1-year mortality in patients discharged after acute myocardial infarction?
A simple prognostic index using four easily obtainable clinical variables can effectively stratify 1-year mortality risk in patients discharged after an acute myocardial infarction.
May aid bedside risk stratification after AMI discharge; leaves open prospective validation before guiding decisions.
Simple clinical variables obtainable in any coronary care unit and in any patient were recorded in 769 consecutive patients who were admitted with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and who were discharged from the hospital and followed for up to 3 years. To identify the patients at highest and lowest risk of posthospital mortality, a prognostic index was established from a stepwise logistic discriminant analysis of variables obtained in a consecutive series of 418 patients discharged alive from one of two coronary care units admitting new patients on alternate days. This prognostic index was validated by applying it to a comparison group of 351 consecutive control patients discharged from the other coronary care unit. In the training group, 59 of the 418 patients (14%) died during the first year after hospital discharge and 34 (8%) died during the second or third year. The stepwise logistic discriminant analysis made it possible to distinguish between 1‐year survivors and nonsurvivors, but not between the patients who died during the second and third years and the 3‐year survivors. Four variables were selected for obtaining a 1‐year prognostic index: the maximum grade of left ventricular function during hospitalization (0 to 4), history of previous AMI (1 or 0), predischarge cardiothoracic ratio (0 to 0.99), and complete bundle branch block (1 or 0). Prognostic index = 7.0196‐0.6515 function ‐1.6623 previous AMI ‐0.0729 cardiothoracic ratio ‐1.0813 bundle branch block. This index was validated in the comparison group. Patients were allocated into three classes with increasing values of the index associated with decreasing risk of 1‐year mortality: patients at high risk (index ≤ 1; mortality 30%), patients at intermediate risk (1 < index ≤ 3; mortality 9%) and those at low risk (index > 3; mortality 3%). Easily obtainable variables may identify patients at risk of dying during the first year after hospital discharge, but not those at risk of dying during the second or third year.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Plérard et al. (1989) conducted a cohort in Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (n=769). Prognostic index (LV function, previous AMI, cardiothoracic ratio, bundle branch block) was evaluated on 1-year posthospital mortality. A prognostic index using four simple clinical variables successfully stratified 1-year post-AMI mortality risk into high (30%), intermediate (9%), and low (3%) risk groups.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: