Key result
Quercetin increases intracellular Ca2+ transients ~28% in mouse myocardium via β-adrenoceptor activation.
Quercetin elicits positive inotropism and alters electrophysiological properties in mouse myocardium via β-adrenoceptor activation.
Hypothesis-generating for quercetin inotropy in preclinical models; should not change clinical practice pending human data.
Quercetin is a plant flavonoid with several biological activities. This study aimed to describe quercetin effects on contractile and electrophysiological properties of the cardiac muscle as well as on calcium handling. Quercetin elicited positive inotropism that was significantly reduced by propranolol indicating an involvement of the sympathetic nervous system. In cardiomyocytes, 30 μM quercetin increased I Ca,L at 0 mV from −0.95 ± 0.01 A/F to −1.21 ± 0.08 A/F. The membrane potential at which 50% of the channels are activated (V 0.5 ) shifted towards more negative potentials from −13.06 ± 1.52 mV to −19.26 ± 1.72 mV and did not alter the slope factor. Furthermore, quercetin increased [Ca 2+ ] i transient by 28% when compared to control. Quercetin accelerated [Ca 2+ ] i transient decay time, which could be attributed to SERCA activation. In resting cardiomyocytes, quercetin did not change amplitude or frequency of Ca 2+ sparks. In isolated heart, quercetin increased heart rate and decreased PRi, QTc and duration of the QRS complex. Thus, we showed that quercetin activates β‐adrenoceptors, leading to increased L‐type Ca 2+ current and cell‐wide intracellular Ca 2+ transient without visible changes in Ca 2+ sparks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santos et al. (2016) studied this question. Quercetin vs. Control was evaluated on Contractile and electrophysiological properties of the cardiac muscle and calcium handling. Quercetin activated β-adrenoceptors in mouse myocardium, increasing L-type Ca2+ current from -0.95 to -1.21 A/F and intracellular Ca2+ transients by 28% compared to control.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: