PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 15, 2022British Journal of General Practice39 citationsOpen Access

Psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on primary care workers: a cross-sectional study

EAEnric AragonèsInstitut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi GolICIsabel del Cura-GonzálezUniversidad de ValladolidLHLucía Hernández‐RivasHospital Universitario La Paz

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a major impact on the mental health of healthcare workers, yet studies in primary care workers are scarce. AIM: To investigate the prevalence of and associated factors for psychological distress in primary care workers during the first COVID-19 outbreak. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a multicentre, cross-sectional, web-based survey conducted in primary healthcare workers in Spain, between May and September 2020. METHOD: Healthcare workers were invited to complete a survey to evaluate sociodemographic and work-related characteristics, COVID-19 infection status, exposure to patients with COVID-19, and resilience (using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale), in addition to being screened for common mental disorders (depression, anxiety disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder, panic attacks, and substance use disorder). Positive screening for any of these disorders was analysed globally using the term 'any current mental disorder'. RESULTS: A total of 2928 primary care professionals participated in the survey. Of them, 43.7% (95% confidence interval CI = 41.9 to 45.4) tested positive for a current mental disorder. Female sex (odds ratio OR 1.61, 95% CI = 1.25 to 2.06), having previous mental disorders (OR 2.58, 95% CI = 2.15 to 3.10), greater occupational exposure to patients with COVID-19 (OR 2.63, 95% CI = 1.98 to 3.51), having children or dependents (OR 1.35, 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.76 and OR 1.59, 95% CI = 1.20 to 2.11, respectively), or having an administrative job (OR 2.24, 95% CI = 1.66 to 3.03) were associated with a higher risk of any current mental disorder. Personal resilience was shown to be a protective factor. CONCLUSION: Almost half of primary care workers showed significant psychological distress. Strategies to support the mental health of primary care workers are necessary, including designing psychological support and resilience-building interventions based on risk factors identified.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Aragonès et al. (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ea00653f874f2b22291fdhttps://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp.2021.0691
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Can gender differences in the prevalence of mental disorders be explained by sociodemographic factors?2004 · 192 citations
  2. 2Gender differences in common mental disorders: a comparison of social risk factors across four European welfare regimes2018 · 27 citations
  3. 3Has COVID-19 changed the workload for primary care physicians? The case of Spain2021 · 35 citations
  4. 4Efficiency and Quality of Data Collection Among Public Mental Health Surveys Conducted During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review2021 · 26 citations
  5. 5How Physicians Manage Medical Uncertainty: A Qualitative Study and Conceptual Taxonomy2021 · 109 citations