Evaluates liver injury treatment with morroniside in rats, suggesting inconsistent protective effects.
Introduction Hepatic ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury remains a major clinical problem during liver surgery and transplantation, primarily due to oxidative stress, inflammatory activation, and hepatocellular damage. Morroniside (MO), an iridoid glycoside derived from Cornus officinalis , has demonstrated anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antifibrotic properties in various experimental models, but its role in hepatic IR injury has not been established. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a single dose of MO on rat liver subjected to partial ischemia and reperfusion. Methods Wistar rats were divided into four groups: control (C), ischemia-reperfusion without treatment (CIR), and IR treated with MO at 90 mg/kg (90MIR) or 270 mg/kg (270MIR). Hepatic injury was assessed biochemically (ALT, AST, PIIINP, antioxidant capacity, cytokine profile), histologically and immunohistochemically (Collagen III, Survivin, HIF-1α, Caspase-8, IL-6). Results IR induced significant hepatocellular injury, reflected by elevated aminotransferases, structural disruption, and increased pro-inflammatory cytokines. MO administration produced dose-dependent and heterogeneous effects. At 90 mg/kg, MO partially attenuated early aminotransferase elevation and reduced TNF-α and VEGF levels, suggesting initial hepatoprotective activity; however, hepatocellular damage and fibrosis markers remained elevated after 24 h. At 270 mg/kg, MO paradoxically decreased antioxidant capacity and did not suppress fibrosis or apoptosis, while only modestly reducing pro-inflammatory cytokines. Histopathological analyses confirmed pronounced liver injury in all IR groups regardless of treatment. Discussion In conclusion, acute pre-procedural administration of MO did not provide consistent protection against hepatic IR injury, and its effects were dose-dependent and ambiguous. Further studies with prolonged dosing regimens and extended reperfusion times are warranted to clarify MO’s hepatoprotective potential.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Trocha et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: