Retrospective cohort study evaluates implant survival in patients on antihyperlipidemic therapy, suggesting positive long-term outcomes.
Background: Antihyperlipidemic medications are widely prescribed for the management of dyslipidemia and prevention of cardiovascular disease and may also influence bone metabolism, formation, and repair. However, their impact on peri-implant bone remodeling and dental implant survival remains insufficiently investigated. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of antihyperlipidemic therapy on dental implant survival and failure rates over a ten-year period. Methods: A retrospective cohort study included 552 patients receiving 1680 dental implants between 2012 and 2022. Patients were divided into a control group (512 patients; 1581 implants) and a study group receiving antihyperlipidemic monotherapy (40 patients; 99 implants). Clinical, radiographic, and demographic data were collected and analyzed, and implant failure was assessed according to the established clinical criteria of the International Congress of Oral Implantologists. Results: Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated significantly better dental implant survival in patients receiving antihyperlipidemic therapy (log-rank p = 0.046). The failure rate was lower in the study group (1.01%) compared with the control group (5.12%). Cox regression analysis, adjusted for age, sex, implant diameter and length, insertion torque, and bone quality, showed that antihyperlipidemic therapy was associated with a markedly reduced risk of implant failure (HR = 0.16). Overall, the use of antihyperlipidemic medications was associated with a significantly lower risk of implant failure (p < 0.05), suggesting a beneficial effect on long-term dental implant survival. Conclusions: The present findings indicate that antihyperlipidemic therapy may be associated with improved dental implant survival and enhanced osseointegration. These results should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating and necessitate confirmation in future prospective randomized controlled studies with expanded and more balanced cohorts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chidiac et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: