Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 1, 1999Journal of Applied Psychology

Assessing interrater agreement on the job relevance of a test: A comparison of CVI, T, rWG(J)}, and r*WG(J)} indexes.

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

MLMichael K. LindellBoise State UniversityCBChristina J. BrandtMichigan State University

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Lindell et al. (1999) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ea11eaa1655e5fb2294b8https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.4.640
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A Revised Index of Interrater Agreement for Multi-Item Ratings of a Single Target1999 · 256 citations
  2. 2Measuring Interrater Agreement for Ratings of a Single Target1997 · 86 citations
  3. 3rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement.1993 · 2,238 citations