PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 21, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Exploiting quantum chaos diagnostics in QAOA for enhanced hybrid quantum classical deep learning classification

JVJavier Villalba-DíezJLJuan Carlos Losada-González

Key Points

  • The aim is to improve hybrid quantum–classical classifiers by integrating quantum chaos diagnostics into the QAOA framework.
  • Analyzed Out-Of-Time-Ordered correlators to extract chaos features.
  • Trained models on 1,000-sample MNIST dataset with varying qubit counts.
  • Employed 5-fold cross-validation and statistical analysis for performance evaluation.
  • Chaos-AwareHybrid improved accuracy for n=4,6,8 with Δ ≈ +0.016 to +0.018, all 95% CI excluding zero.
  • At n=10, performance declined with Δ = -0.022, indicating over-sensitivity.
  • Optimal accuracy achieved at n=8, with an average of 0.9006 ± 0.0069 and 100% win-rate.

Abstract

Abstract The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is repurposed here as a feature map within a hybrid quantum–classical classifier, augmented by a chaos-informed diagnostic. We extract a scalar chaos feature by evaluating an Out-Of-Time-Ordered correlators (OTOC) along parameter-scaling rays through the trained circuit, computing spacings between local minima, and standardizing them via a pre-fitted lognormal model. To probe finite-size effects, we sweep the number of qubits n \4, 6, 8, 10\ at fixed depth p=2 and train two models on a balanced 1, 000-sample MNIST subset: a StandardHybrid using the n local Pauli- Z expectations, and a ChaosAwareHybrid which appends the OTOC-derived scalar. We perform multi-run, 5-fold cross-validation with a paired design (identical seeds/folds across models) and report mean±SD, paired mean differences, 95% t- and bootstrap CIs, exact permutation/sign tests, win-rates (Wilson 95% CI), and paired effect sizes. Across N_ pairs=\50, 50, 67, 50\ for n=\4, 6, 8, 10\, the chaos-aware variant significantly improves test accuracy at n \4, 6, 8\ with +0. 016 – +0. 018, all 95% CIs excluding zero, permutation p 0, high win-rates (86–100%), and large paired effects (dᵦ 1. 0 –2. 3). At n=10 the effect reverses (=-0. 022, 2% win-rate, dᵦ=-2. 20), indicating over-sensitivity. The best average accuracy occurs at n=8 (0. 9006 0. 0069 ; =+0. 0180 ; 100% wins). Per-epoch panels (train/val/test; mean±1 SD) reveal a “Goldilocks” width at which expressivity and sensitivity are balanced. These results show that a calibrated chaos diagnostic can enhance hybrid quantum–classical classifiers in resource-limited regimes and provide a principled knob to match circuit expressivity to many-body sensitivity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Villalba-Díez et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ea127be05d6e3efb5f8fehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-51870-8
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper