PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 21, 20260 citationsOpen Access

A U131 Candidate Prediction for the Absolute Neutrino Mass Scale Normal-Ordering Mass Eigenvalues, Effective Beta-Decay Mass, Majorana-Phase Range, and Falsification Boundaries

View Full Paper
KTKen TakadaEEnumiaze

Key Points

  • This research aims to provide a predictive model for the absolute neutrino mass scale and its associated parameters under normal ordering conditions.
  • Utilized the frozen rule m_lightest(NO) = sqrt(Delta m21^2) * lambda^2 with lambda = 1/(3 phi) to derive predictions.
  • Employed NuFIT 6.0 normal-ordering oscillation data to calculate specific neutrino mass values and effective beta-decay mass.
  • Conducted comparisons with upper-bound constraints from KATRIN and Planck 2018 + BAO.
  • Predicted neutrino masses: m1 = 3.66e-4 eV, m2 = 8.63e-3 eV, m3 = 5.08e-2 eV, with a total Sigma m_nu = 5.98e-2 eV.
  • Effective beta decay mass predicted as m_beta = 8.91e-3 eV; Majorana-phase range from m_bb = 1.23e-3 to 3.96e-3 eV.
  • Falsification boundaries established with explicit no-retuning conditions, indicating the robustness of the predictions.

Abstract

This record contains Paper 053 of the Enumiaze Research Program. The manuscript presents a bounded U131 candidate prediction audit for the absolute neutrino mass scale under normal ordering. The frozen rule is mₗightest (NO) = sqrt (Delta m21²) * lambda², with lambda = 1/ (3 phi). Using an embedded NuFIT 6. 0 normal-ordering oscillation row, the branch predicts m1 = 3. 66e-4 eV, m2 = 8. 63e-3 eV, m3 = 5. 08e-2 eV, Sigma mₙu = 5. 98e-2 eV, mbeta = 8. 91e-3 eV, and mbb = 1. 23e-3 to 3. 96e-3 eV. The prediction is compared against current upper-bound constraints from KATRIN and Planck 2018 + BAO and is formulated with explicit falsification and no-retuning conditions. The paper does not claim discovery, complete derivation of neutrino mass, proof of Majorana nature, or full derivation of the Standard Model. Source code is not reproduced; mathematical definitions, algorithmic steps, exact-check summaries, and claim boundaries are provided for reproducibility.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Takada et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ea127be05d6e3efb5f9b2https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20278188
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper