In recent years, artificial intelligence has been fully involved in design practice and educational activities, and its impact on practice and education has received widespread attention from the academic community. This study aimed to preliminarily explore, through a controlled experiment, the differences in the impact of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools and traditional web/literature tools on the sustainable design learning outcomes of interior design students in a specific teaching context at a university in China. A study was conducted on 58 third-year college students who were divided into an AI tool group (Class B) and a traditional tool group (Class A). Three semi-structured questionnaire surveys were conducted over two months to collect data on their understanding, attitudes, and practical applications of sustainable design. Quantitative statistics and text analysis methods were used for the comparison. The results showed that under specific experimental conditions, students who used AI tools showed a more significant improvement in their self-evaluation of knowledge mastery, but their sense of recognition of the importance of knowledge and subsequent learning willingness also decreased. In subsequent design practice, students in the traditional tool group showed higher initiative in applying concepts and diversity in strategies. Text analysis further suggests that AI-assisted learning may be more conducive to the rapid structured acquisition of knowledge, while traditional learning methods exhibit different characteristics in promoting deep semantic associations. The conclusions of this study are based on short-term experimental observations of specific samples and toolsets, revealing the tension between efficiency and depth that may be faced when integrating AI tools into interior design education, providing a reference and discussion basis for broader and longer-term teaching research in the future.
Song et al. (Sat,) studied this question.