Compares physiological responses during the six-minute walk test in patients with cirrhosis, indicating reduced endurance and delayed recovery.
Background and Aims: Patients with cirrhosis awaiting transplantation have well-documented reductions in aerobic capacity, yet the physiological responses during functional assessments that underlie these limitations are not fully understood. This study compared the physiological responses during a six-minute walk test (6MWT) in patients with cirrhosis awaiting transplantation to age-matched controls. Methods: Thirty participants with cirrhosis awaiting transplantation (11 female, 58±7 y, 77% Child Pugh B/C) and 20 controls (5 female; 62±11 y) were enrolled. Heart rate (HR), oxygen consumption (VO₂; portable device), and calf muscle oxygenation (SmO₂; near-infrared spectroscopy) were continuously measured prior to (5-min), during, and after (5-min) the 6MWT. HR and VO₂ recovery kinetics were analyzed using non-linear exponential decay modeling (OriginLab, 2023b) to calculate the mean response time (MRT), while calf muscle oxygenation (SmO₂) was assessed using the half-time recovery metric (t₅₀). Results: At rest, the cirrhosis group had a higher HR ( p =0.020) and lower calf SmO₂ ( p =0.036) compared to controls, while VO₂ was not significantly different between groups. The cirrhosis group walked a shorter distance than controls (414±131 m vs. 624±72 m; p <0.001), and had a significantly lower HR, VO₂, and tissue deoxygenation during exercise. Despite these exercise-related impairments, recovery kinetics, measured by HR MRT and SmO₂ t₅₀,were comparable between groups ( p >0.999 and p =0.151, respectively). In contrast, VO₂ MRT was significantly slower in the cirrhosis group (85±23 s vs. 61±18 s; p <0.001). Conclusions: Individuals with cirrhosis awaiting transplantation have reduced aerobic endurance and delayed VO₂ recovery reinforcing the rationale for prehabilitation and suggesting that extended recovery periods during exercise training may be beneficial.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Skow et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: