Formalizes a structural condition for identity and continuity, suggesting it underpins various domains.
This paper formalizes C² = C as a foundational structural condition beneath coherent identity, reference, attribution, and continuity. The central claim is that anything identified as itself across change requires recoverable continuity: the continuity relation by which a thing is tracked must itself remain continuous enough to be recovered. The paper distinguishes C² = C from ordinary idempotence, conservation laws, continuity equations, persistence theories, and domain-specific stability models. It introduces a minimal formal schema involving domains, states, transformations, recovery relations, continuity-classes, admissible transformations, and structural tests for traceability, composability, attributability, and reflexive stability. C² = C is presented not as a replacement for physics, biology, mathematics, consciousness studies, economics, language, or institutional theory, but as a prior condition those domains already require whenever they identify objects, track transformations, preserve reference, assign attribution, compare states, or explain persistence. The paper consolidates the broader recoverable-continuity research program by stating the underlying principle directly: continuity must remain continuous for anything to remain identifiable as itself across change.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parnell Turner (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: