This piece reflects on two 'ontological turns': the recent anthropological movement and that occasioned earlier in analytic philosophy by the work of W. V. O. Quine. I argue that the commitment entailed by 'ontology' is incompatible with the laudable aim of the 'ontological turn' in anthropology to take seriously radical difference and alterity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paolo Heywood (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: