PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 21, 2026Sustainability0 citationsOpen Access

Sustainability of Face-to-Face and Online Learning in Compulsory Courses: A Case Study of an Arabic Language Course at the German Jordanian University

View Full Paper
MAMohammad AlhrootTRTamara Al Rawwad

Key Points

  • This study investigates the effectiveness of online versus face-to-face learning in an Arabic language course.
  • Analyzed data from 3651 students enrolled in an 'Advanced Arabic Language' course over six academic years.
  • Compared three years of face-to-face instruction with three years of online learning instruction.
  • Used independent samples t-tests and ANOVA to assess learning outcomes and interactions with major type.
  • Face-to-face learning outperformed online learning by an average of 6.2 points (d = 0.55).
  • Significant interaction found between learning mode and students’ major type, indicating variations in effectiveness.
  • Findings suggest a need for ongoing evaluation of instructional methods for sustainability.

Abstract

The effectiveness of instructional modes in higher education—particularly online learning versus face-to-face instruction—remains a critical question for designing sustainable and high-quality educational practices. Understanding how these modes influence student learning outcomes is essential for informing evidence-based and sustainable teaching strategies across diverse courses and student populations. This quantitative study addresses this question by analyzing data from 3651 students enrolled in the “Advanced Arabic Language” course over six academic years at the German Jordanian University. Three years of face-to-face instruction (2016/2017–2018/2019) were compared with three years of online learning instruction (2021/2022–2023/2024). Independent samples t-tests showed that face-to-face learning significantly outperformed online learning, with online learning students scoring on average 6.2 points lower, corresponding to a moderate effect size (d = 0.55). ANOVA revealed a significant interaction between learning mode and students’ major type, indicating that instructional effectiveness varies with academic background. These findings underscore the importance of continuously evaluating instructional methods to ensure effective and sustainable learning outcomes. By situating the analysis within both global and local contexts, this study contributes to the literature by advancing understanding of the impact and sustainability of online learning versus face-to-face instruction in higher education.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Alhroot et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ea196be05d6e3efb605e0https://doi.org/10.3390/su18105129
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Factors Affecting Student Learning Experience: The Case of Arabic Calligraphy and Morphology Subjects in MSU KFCIAAS During Online Modality2024
  2. 2Approaching literary texts via online learning during COVID-19 pandemic in Jordan: Challenges and obstacles2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3Language Learning Outcomes in on Ground Vs. Online Settings: Comparison and Correlation2024
  4. 4Adults’ Perceptions of Studying English in Face-to-Face, Online, and Blended Modalities2024
  5. 5Face-to-Face and E-learning Styles for Undergraduate Engineering Technology Students During COVID-19 Pandemic2024 · 1 citations