Reconceptualizing the "economic dimension" of sustainability based on a review of theories of the firm across economic schools of thought

Michael Curran

doi:10.5281/zenodo.20280513

March 21, 2026Open Access

Reconceptualizing the "economic dimension" of sustainability based on a review of theories of the firm across economic schools of thought

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

This paper aims to explore how the economic dimension of sustainability is interpreted through different theories of the firm across economic schools.
Review of various theories of the firm from multiple economic schools of thought.
Analysis of how each theory addresses the economic dimension of sustainability.
Identified varying interpretations of the economic dimension of sustainability among different economic theories.
Proposed a redefined approach to understanding sustainability in the context of economic theory.

Ask about this paper

Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.

Implication

Conference paper discusses integrating the economic aspect of sustainability in various economic theories, implying a need for broader acceptance.

Abstract

This publication is a conference paper submitted to 100th Annual Conference of The Agricultural Economics Society, Wadham College, The University of Oxford, UK (23rd – 25th March 2026).

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Michael Curran (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ea196be05d6e3efb60640 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20280513

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Reconceptualizing the "economic dimension" of sustainability based on a review of theories of the firm across economic schools of thought

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Reconceptualizing the "economic dimension" of sustainability based on a review of theories of the firm across economic schools of thought

Key Points

Ask about this paper

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading