Analytic reductions demonstrate refined approaches for quotient-weighted distributions, indicating improved outcomes in prime distributions.
We isolate the analytic Type II obstructions that arise in quotient-weighted distribution estimates for the companion Chen--Wu--Richert criterion. The refined formulation separates three tasks: a sub-$1/3$ quotient P₂ range, which is proved here from Type I estimates and completion; the remaining balanced shifted semiprime-prime problem, i.e. primes of the form $qr+2$ with $q,r$ prime and y1/3<q<y1/2; and a balanced exact-prime-product P₃ slice between $66/107$ and $5/8$. For the balanced P₃ slice this version records a theorem-level three-piece upper treatment: the factor-placement-good wedge is covered with constant $2$, the bad wedge with u≤2/7 is treated by Pascadi's special-factor theorem, and the bad wedge with $u>2/7$ is treated by a direct triple-prime convolution Bombieri--Vinogradov theorem plus an ordinary upper linear sieve, giving constant $4$. We also include a certified special-factor refinement of the fixed P₄ residual; the companion coefficient certificate encloses the refined cost in $[0.13631427,0.13710612]$ and certifies a gain $>0.0165$ over the old P₄ residual. These two theorem-level refinements together certify remaining tolerance above $1.086$ for the balanced shifted semiprime-prime sector. This version then reformulates that sector in the more intrinsic language of binary shifted convolution: after a high-order Heath--Brown decomposition of Λ(qr+2), Type I and non-top branches are reduced to standard convolution-Bombieri--Vinogradov and smooth binary additive-divisor inputs, while the primitive top branch is isolated as a shifted convolution with the special HB-small coefficient generated by Lz/Uz, equivalently as $CD=qr+2$ with two HB-small well-factorable weights on the shifted side. For possible full balanced-P₃ control, the paper further isolates the simultaneous top all-small branch and the quotient-weighted friable progression estimate that would close it; the quotient coefficient is the only part not matched to Pascadi's stated $5/8$ friable distribution theorem. The paper is a reduction and target-problem document: standard distribution theorems are quoted only where their coefficient classes, local singular factors, and quotient weights match the stated hypotheses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marshall Ratliff (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: