Key result
DOACs require assessing age, renal function, stroke risk, and gastrointestinal bleeding to minimize hemorrhagic complications.
Why the study?
In clinical practice, fear of bleeding often leads to withholding or inappropriately reducing the dose of oral anticoagulants, with bleeding risks typically overestimated.
Comprehensive assessment of bleeding risk factors and patient characteristics can improve the safety and appropriate prescribing of oral anticoagulants.
The review article presents dates about the physiology and pathophysiology of the hemostasis system, discusses the features of the use of oral anticoagulants in clinical practice. Oral anticoagulants are drugs characterized by predictable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, a favorable efficacy and safety profile. The article considers the main clinical and pharmacological characteristics of apixaban, rivaroxaban and dabigatran (bioavailability, metabolism, excretion); factors that increase the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding associated with anticoagulant therapy; drug interactions; the possibility of gastroprotection in patients taking oral anticoagulants. In real clinical practice, the reason for not prescribing or unreasonably reducing the dose of oral anticoagulants is the fear of bleeding. In this case, the risks of bleeding, as a rule, are overestimated. Knowledge of bleeding risk factors, prognostic scales and management of risk factors is an approach that can improve the safety of anticoagulant therapy. In clinical practice, the choice of the ideal oral anticoagulants, in addition to taking into account the risk of bleeding, should be based on a comprehensive assessment, including an assessment of the patient's age, risk of stroke and coronary events, renal function, and predicted compliance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Бакулина et al. (2023) conducted a review in Thrombosis and thromboembolic complications. Direct oral anticoagulants (apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran) was evaluated. Direct oral anticoagulants require a comprehensive assessment of gastrointestinal bleeding risks, patient age, stroke risk, and renal function to optimize safety and minimize hemorrhagic complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: